Penned by: Bernard Quayson

LET THE STRONG SURVIVE

A few months ago, when the flagbearership race began, along with the unusual comments that accompanied them in Ghana politics, it became evident that some of these comments were exceptionally absurd. Perhaps it all boils down to individuals’ thirst for power, even if it means compromising the highest authority and the law by involving foreigners. It remains puzzling why the former president (Mahama) would champion a cause that risks the presidency being held by dual citizens with conflicting interests. Undoubtedly, “a dying elephant cares neither about the beauty of a butterfly nor the shade of an umbrella.“

The fact is that, things have become exceedingly challenging, despite the ruling NPP’s efforts to stabilize the economy in the midst of the ongoing global economic upheaval driven by AI (Artificial Intelligence) revolution. While there have been international treaties aiming to promote global peace and trade, the recent 78th session of the United Nations General Assembly, as evidenced by member nations, suggests otherwise, indicating that we may face more conflicts in this AI-driven era. This is precisely why Bawumia’s strong focus on database management and his digital agenda are commendable, as they are essential for us to adapt to the AI revolution. However, his ungrateful comment towards the party (NPP) does raise concerns.

It’s a known fact that NPP has been associated with intellectual prowess in the country, which is why Dr. Bawumia was favored to assist Nana despite his late entry into the NPP in 2008. Nevertheless, it is surprising to hear a comment like “he did the dirty work for the NPP but has been betrayed by the party.” The question is: whom did he expect to defend his boss (Nana) in the supreme court after surpassing long-time party members to become the running mate for the same election that was intended to make him the vice president?

That tribal comment could have potentially divided the party, but the recent NPP election results (Super Delegate Conference) demonstrate the party’s commitment to democracy and meritocracy. It is evident that the NPP values capability over tribalism. Alan’s low vote count of 10 out of 113 from the Ashanti region, with the majority going to Dr Bawumia and some to Hon Kennedy, reflects the practice of democracy and inclusivity. Alan’s decision to run as an independent candidate is immature and shows he may not be fit for the presidency, given his lackluster performance after over seven years in ministerial positions and as a cabinet member.

While Alan initiated promising policies like the 1D1F and the Ghana Automotive Development Policy (GADP), they struggled with implementation, making it challenging for him to make an impact in the upcoming 2024 presidential election. Instead of going independent, he could have resigned and supported the party’s chosen candidate or considered grassroots opinions.

Perhaps Alan’s decision was influenced by the political landscape, but his absence from the party doesn’t create a void. However, there’s concern that people in the Mpohor district, the hometown of the late Stephen Kraikue, a founding member of the NPP, may opt for the opposition candidate (Hon. Kofi Bentil) in the parliamentary elections due to perceived neglect. The incumbent MP, Hon John Sanie, advocating for the Vice President despite failing to fulfill his promise to fix the district’s road, raises concerns about his effectiveness.

The road must be fixed, as it’s crucial for the welfare of the occupants, campaign activities and NPP’s credibility in the district. Despite global challenges, NPP still has a good chance of securing victory in the 2024 election if they pair Dr. Bawumia and Hon. Kennedy. This would put pressure on ex-President Mahama to reconsider his political future. Just like fixing the Mpohor road is essential, as it is going to jeopardize the career of another young and vibrant politician from the opposition side.

Therefore, we urge the MP of the district to cease internal advocacy and focus on urging the Vice President to address the road issue. Maintaining his position in office is contingent upon this critical action, as there is no alternative solution that will secure his tenure without addressing the road problem. Delegates should not be misled into voting for the same person, and if they do, it would be a perplexing decision and there would be no rational way to account for their decision, except as madness. 

To whom it may concern: